Full Report

Report Strands
| Introduction | Resources & Funding | Professional Development |
| Curriculum Development & Assessment | Home-School-Community Collaboration |
 | Leadership Development & Political Advocacy | Research Agenda |


Forum Proceedings
National Forum on Asian and Pacific American Education
October 2-4,1998
California State University, Long Beach, California
by Chiung-Sally Chou
President, National Association for Asian and Pacific American Education (NAAPAE)
and
KimOanh Nguyen-Lam
President, National Association for the Education and the Advancement of Cambodian, Laotian, and Vietnamese Americans (NAFEA)

Several years ago, the Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Language Affairs (OBEMLA) of the United States Department of Education (USDOE), in collaboration with several other agencies, sponsored two National Forums on Asian and Pacific American Education in Pomona, California, and New York City. Both meetings brought about educators and other service providers to examine the needs of and services to Asian and Pacific American students. Both meetings identified the critical areas of service delivery. At that time, services to the Asian and Pacific American students were limited in scope and most of the service providers were school districts and some community based organizations.

In 1998, as we approach to the upcoming Census 2000, it has become necessary to re-examine the current educational services to the Asian and Pacific American (APA) communities across the nation. The APA communities are the fastest growing among all ethnic groups. The issues concerning these students at hand are identified as follows:

  1. resource and funding for APA students in the areas of bilingual education, English language literacy, technology literacy, math and science education, and school-to-career experiences;
  2. professional development for all school faculty and staff members, peace officers and the juvenile justice system, and mental health and social service workers working with APA students from pre-K-12 to post-secondary education;
  3. curriculum development and assessment to provide culturally sensitive and adequate materials to promote self-esteem, sensitivity, knowledge and skills to live in a diverse society;
  4. home-school-community collaboration to provide the parents and the school communities the knowledge and skills to improve the educational system;
  5. leadership development and political advocacy to be active and effective participants in the political process to call attention to APA student needs; and
  6. research agenda to ensure inclusion of APA student data in all national research projects, especially a request of over-sampling.
The National Association for Asian and Pacific American Education (NAAPAE) and the National Association for the Education and the Advancement of Cambodian, Laotian, and Vietnamese Americans (NAFEA) began planning to hold another education forum to evaluate current services to the Asian and Pacific American students. This working commenced in June, 1998, to develop and organize a plan to deliver the initial framework of this APA Forum. With a strong backing from Delia Pompa, Director, Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Language Affairs (OBEMLA) of the U. S. Department of Education, assistance from Dang Pham, then Deputy Director of OBEMLA, and Edward Fujimoto of the Office of Public Affairs and also of the US Department of Education, KimOanh Nguyen-Lam, President of NAFEA and Sally Chou NAAPAE, along with two interns, Seung Lee and Anderson Lee, began collaboration and planning for this national forum on Asian and Pacific American education All planning sessions have been conducted via telephone conferences and e-mail through the months of June and July. Planning and execution of the Forum continued until October when the Forum was held on the campus of the California State University at Long Beach. The Center for Language Minority Education and Research (CLMER) also rendered assistance by providing in-kind contribution of consultants and logistics. The outcome from this Forum will be the proceedings from the six topics which are to be published and disseminated to all attendees and other public and private agencies in order to heighten every one's awareness of the current status of the Asian and Pacific American students.

Three invited guests addressed the attendees of this National Forum. Mr. Sidney Morrison, President of the 15,000-member Association of California School Administrators (ACSA) spoke of the organization's vision and mission to bring true diversity in the work place. Dr. Edward Fujimoto, Deputy Director of Public Affairs/Office of the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education brought greetings from the Secretary and the White House. He spoke on the efforts from the current administration in appointments and programs that benefit schools and students. Ms. Delia Pompa, Director of the Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Language Affairs of the U.S. Department of Education updated the attendees on the current budget negotiations and the need for input for the upcoming reauthorization of the Improving American Schools Act (IASA), and the status of bilingual education.

The presenters, facilitators of each of the six strands identified above, were asked to examine the issues in three dimensions: gains/current status, remaining challenges, and recommendations. The notion of this format was to recognize and validate the progress and accomplishments made in the areas of services to APA students; to identify critical issues and obstacles; and to make recommendations to our own communities and other federal, state, and local governments and organizations.

 

STRAND 1: Resources and Funding

Presenters were asked to: Presenters: Facilitators: Gains: Remaining Challenges: Recommendations:

STRAND 2: Professional Development

Presenters were asked to: Presenters: Facilitators: Gains: Remaining Challenges: Recommendations:

STRAND 3: Curriculum Development and Assessment

Presenters were asked to: Presenters: Facilitators: Gains: Remaining Challenges: Recommendations:

STRAND 4: Home-School-Community Partnership

Presenters were asked to: Presenters: Facilitators: Gains: Remaining Challenges: Recommendations:

STRAND 5 : Leadership Development and Political Advocacy

Presenters were asked to: Presenters: Facilitators: Gains: Remaining Challenges: Recommendations:

STRAND 6: Research Agenda

Presenters were asked to: Presenters: Facilitators: Gains: Remaining Challenges: Recommendations:  | Top | Home |